رزومه


مهدی نامداری پژمان

مهدی نامداری پژمان

استادیار

عضو هیئت علمی تمام وقت

دانشکده: علوم تربیتی

گروه: آموزش ابتدایی

مقطع تحصیلی: دکترای تخصصی

مهدی نامداری پژمان

استادیار مهدی نامداری پژمان

عضو هیئت علمی تمام وقت
دانشکده: علوم تربیتی - گروه: آموزش ابتدایی مقطع تحصیلی: دکترای تخصصی |

Ontologies of Distributed Leadership: a heideggerian reinterpretation of educational management as dwelling-in-practice

عنوان لاتین مقالهOntologies of Distributed Leadership: a Heideggerian Reinterpretation of Educational Management as Dwelling-in-Practice
نویسندگانNamdari-Pejman M.
نشریهJournal of Philosophical Investigations
كد DOI/DOR10.22034/jpiut.2025.70233.4333
شماره صفحات575
صفحه پايان590
شماره سریال19
شماره مجلد53
نوع مقالهFull Paper
تاریخ انتشار2026
رتبه نشریهمعتبر بین‌المللی (WOS/Scopus) Q2
نوع نشریهچاپی
کشور محل چاپایران

چکیده مقاله

Distributed leadership (DL) is a key framework in contemporary educational theory that moves beyond heroic, individual-centered models of leadership by emphasizing collective, relational practices. While DL effectively captures how leadership emerges through interactions among educators, administrators, and context, it often remains at an ontic level, focusing on observable tasks and role distributions while overlooking deeper ontological questions about educational being. This paper offers a philosophical reconfiguration of DL through Martin Heidegger’s existential phenomenology, drawing on the concepts of Being-in-the-world, dwelling, and care. It reconceptualizes DL as dwelling-in-practice, wherein educational actors are understood not as isolated agents but as primordially involved beings who co-constitute their shared world through attuned everyday engagement. From this perspective, the school appears not as a neutral container but as a meaningful place sustained by collective care. This ontological reframing highlights how leadership emerges from being-with-others (Mitsein) and shared involvement, rather than from functional distributions alone. It also illuminates existential dimensions often neglected in DL, such as disruption, unhomeliness, and interpretive responsiveness. Grounded in recent empirical studies, this approach advocates leadership development oriented toward ontological attunement, trust, and dialogue, and proposes evaluation criteria that privilege world-building over instrumental outcomes. Ultimately, viewing DL as dwelling-in-practice offers a more humane and sustainable vision of educational leadership focused on human flourishing. © The Author(s).

لینک ثابت مقاله